In Chile, the students that graduate from scholar education have to take the Test for University selection (PSU), and be able to enter at the superior education. The PSU is a standard test that allows the system of selection that classifies the student’s accord economic, social and politic criteria. With that the society puts limits and restricts the election of choosing a career that you want to study, since the educative system at be subordinated to the neoliberal economy, conceived the education as a business, were only the student that have purchasing power can study, otherwise debt a long time for enters at superior education and thus accomplish the end of this one, get a profession.
What happens to those people that enters at the education career and it is not what they wanted for their lives and must work with people with feel, think and act?
The problem happens when, at be dissatisfied with his labor, the teacher makes his duty wrong, that means he can´t motivate his students, doesn´t show will, interest, or the responsibility needs to practice discipline and love to his work and thus this reflects in that his students can´t achieve to learn, since they doesn´t get a proper environment were the educator transmit his joy for teaching.
What happens when the end of education can´t be achieve although the vocation of the professionals?
It´s important that the professional when faces this challenge can be able through his reasonableness, creativity and impetuosity overcome these difficulties and create the means necessary to achieve his goal, teach. For a professional that teaching makes him happy, will find every mean necessary for his students to learn, otherwise for the professional that teaching wasn´t what he wanted for his life, will complies with the reality that he has and won´t do much for his students to learn.
As a way of conclusion I argue that, an ethic professional choose correctly his profession.
I make this thesis in general for all the professionals, as Aristotle would say, the common good it´s above the individual, what I mean it´s if everyone choose correctly his profession everyone will be happy with their jobs and this benefit everybody, cause beyond other ends like money, each person would choose his profession because it produce satisfaction or pleasure to them and because it correspond to a greater good.
2 comments:
I can see that you have made a big effort to write an original post. Although it´s not very clear at times, you have expressed some quite sensible ideas in it.
Here's your corrected post.
Thesis of the essay:
choosING YOUR profession correctly IS An ethicAL ISSUE.
In Chile, the students that graduate from HIGH SCHOOL have to take the Test for University selection (PSU) TO be able to START HIGHER education. The PSU is a standard test that allows A system of selection that classifies the students accordING TO economic, social and politic criteria. With that the society puts limits and restricts the election of THE career that you want to study, since the educative system, BECAUSE IT IS subordinated to the neoliberal economy, IT conceivES the education as business, IN WHICH only the students that have purchasing power can study. [Otherwise debt a long time for enters at superior education and thus accomplish the end of this one, get a profession.= NOT CLEAR]
What happens to those people that enter(/) the education career EVEN WHEN it is not what they wanted for their lives and SO THEY must work with people [with feel, think and act=NOT CLEAR?]
The problem happens when, beING dissatisfied with his JOB, the teacher DOes his duty wrong, that means he can´t motivate his students, doesn´t show will, interest, or the responsibility needED to practice HIS PROFESSION NOR love to his work and thus, this reflects in that his students can´t learn, since they don´t get a proper environment wHere the educator transmitS his joy for teaching.
What happens when the GOALS of education can´t be achieve DESPITE the vocation of the professionals?
It´s important that the professional, when facING this challenge, be able TO, overcome these difficulties through his reasonableness, creativity and impetuosity and create the necessary means to achieve his goal: teachING. A professional that FINDS THAT teaching makes him happy, will find every necessary mean for his students to learn. HOWEVER/ON THE CONTRARY the professional FOR WHOM teaching Isn´t what he wanted for his life, will (complY with=?) the reality that he has and won´t do much for his students to learn.
As a way of conclusion I argue that, an ethicAL professional choosES correctly his profession.
This thesis IS MEANT, in general, for all the professionals. as Aristotle would say, the PUBLIC INTEREST Is above the individual. What I mean Is THAT if everyone chooseS his profession correctly everyone will be happy with their jobs and this WILL benefit everybody, cause beyond other ends like money, each person would choose his profession because it WILL produce satisfaction or pleasure to them and because it correspondS to a greater WELLBEING.
I can see that you have made a big effort to write an original post. Although it´s not very clear at times, you have expressed some quite sensible ideas in it.
Here's your corrected post.
Thesis of the essay:
choosING YOUR profession correctly IS An ethicAL ISSUE.
In Chile, the students that graduate from HIGH SCHOOL have to take the Test for University selection (PSU) TO be able to START HIGHER education. The PSU is a standard test that allows A system of selection that classifies the students accordING TO economic, social and politic criteria. With that the society puts limits and restricts the election of THE career that you want to study, since the educative system, BECAUSE IT IS subordinated to the neoliberal economy, IT conceivES the education as business, IN WHICH only the students that have purchasing power can study. [Otherwise debt a long time for enters at superior education and thus accomplish the end of this one, get a profession.= NOT CLEAR]
What happens to those people that enter(/) the education career EVEN WHEN it is not what they wanted for their lives and SO THEY must work with people [with feel, think and act=NOT CLEAR?]
The problem happens when, beING dissatisfied with his JOB, the teacher DOes his duty wrong, that means he can´t motivate his students, doesn´t show will, interest, or the responsibility needED to practice HIS PROFESSION NOR love to his work and thus, this reflects in that his students can´t learn, since they don´t get a proper environment wHere the educator transmitS his joy for teaching.
What happens when the GOALS of education can´t be achieve DESPITE the vocation of the professionals?
It´s important that the professional, when facING this challenge, be able TO, overcome these difficulties through his reasonableness, creativity and impetuosity and create the necessary means to achieve his goal: teachING. A professional that FINDS THAT teaching makes him happy, will find every necessary mean for his students to learn. HOWEVER/ON THE CONTRARY the professional FOR WHOM teaching Isn´t what he wanted for his life, will (complY with=?) the reality that he has and won´t do much for his students to learn.
As a way of conclusion I argue that, an ethicAL professional choosES correctly his profession.
This thesis IS MEANT, in general, for all the professionals. as Aristotle would say, the PUBLIC INTEREST Is above the individual. What I mean Is THAT if everyone chooseS his profession correctly everyone will be happy with their jobs and this WILL benefit everybody, cause beyond other ends like money, each person would choose his profession because it WILL produce satisfaction or pleasure to them and because it correspondS to a greater WELLBEING.
Post a Comment